Rated 4 out of 5Â by captainhandy Read the description!
No mistake, these are decent gloves.
My mistake was not to notice the bit that says, "breathable back". In other words, the back of the hand and fingers are not well protected from ingress of moisture and dust. This was an issue for me when stripping noxious antifouling from the bottom of my boat.
Take a look at the illustration â the black areas of the glove ARE nitrile coated. The blue areas are uncoated but tightly woven elastic mesh. If this does the trick for you, then great. Maybe I should have gone for type 377.
It's a shame that so many gloves are produced in a limited range of sizes. XL is just about okay for me, but I'd prefer XXL.
25 Apr 2016
Rated 4 out of 5Â by Mikeemoo Not bad for cycling too
Have had several pairs of these for light work duties as they have very good dexterity.
Got a large an they come up smallish for the size.
Have recently started using them for cycling as they are cheap, offer good grip, some wind resistance and dry out quick of they get wet.
A great pair of gloves to have laying around for odd jobs
11 Dec 2015
Rated 5 out of 5Â by PetePlasterer The only gloves you need
A common problem when regular builders gloves is the fact that the back is just material and offers no protection. I've used these for laying insulation and for wet work like rendering. My hands are kept dry and no fibres from the insulation have made it too my hands.
8 Jun 2015
Rated 5 out of 5Â by rav77 best gloves so far
I've used number of types from different producers and this ones are far beyond competition. Maybe there are better ones. Somewhere. But I stick to this ones.
2 Jun 2015